zarx said:
And don't you think it's time to remove the 4870 and 6770 GPUs from the Wii U? We have seen the physical Wii U chip and the die is far too small to be anyhting close to those GPUs, even if the die sisn't include a large amount of eDRAM. There are now several sources for x86 bassed next Xbox, and for a very high end box such as this one http://semiaccurate.com/2012/09/04/microsoft-xbox-next-delay-rumors-abound/ and to a lesser extent (don't seem very reliable but do add to the general trend) http://www.kitguru.net/software/gaming/jules/microsoft-chooses-amd-fusion-ii-for-xbox-720/ and http://www.vgleaks.com/whats-inside-durangos-alpha-kit/. I think it's at least worth including 8 core x86 CPU and the high end GCN bassed GPU even without specifics.
"Our semi-custom APUs already have a number of confidential, high-volume design wins in place," Read said. "We expect our embedded business will comprise approximately 20 percent of our quarterly revenue by the fourth quarter of 2013, up from 5 percent today." Custom APU desgins for high volume sounds like consoles to me. |
You know what... its late, I'm not thinking. I was really only thinking of the memory as 8GB would be dev kit and a lot more but 4-6GB would be retail. OP is also talking about IBM vs Intel or AMD CPUs and its the later rumors GPU that's close. Just ignore that entire part of my previous post sorry.
I do agree that there is becoming a trend where neXtBox does seem to have an x86 processor. However, it just doesn't seem logical that it will be the ultra-highend (2013 models) that this rumor would have you believe. Tomorrow I'll refresh the OP with parts of this info as they are now becoming more common on other sites and even GAF. This way I can also get the details needed for the 2nd post for real comparisons.
As for WiiU, I've seen arguments on GAF that the sizes prove one of those or other GPUs, so I'm leaving it until it launches and it is validated one way or the other.