Microsoft Kinect: Why it failed to do what it was supposed to do even though it was successful

[sales2099]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

phenom08 said:

oniyide said:

 

you live in your own world as usual, SOny didnt put anywhere near the ads that mS did for Kinect thats not pushing, by that logic. When all those games flop we should just stop blaming companies as not pushing them and sending them out to die. Since that seems to be a popular excuse when a game someone like doenst do well. SOny already stated they made profit off of every Move equipment sold. so fail on your part. No Resort could have been made without it, it just would have sucked cause there would have been crappy accuracy. 

When you can show me an ounce of proof Sony didn't "push it" then you will have an arguement. Until then no, Move failed and Sony tried. If they didn't try it would have not been created. Sony making profit is irrelevant (they have been losing money all gen so good job on making profit on that).

P.S. Since this is offtopic, I wont be replying after this.

I've never seen an ad for the Sony Eyetoy last gen, and I've only seen a couple ads for the  Move. I can truly say I cannot count how many Microsoft ad's I've seen for Modern Warfare, Gears of War, Halo, Kinect or even the Xbox 360. Anytime a Microsoft product comes out they run American television. I've seen more Gamestop ads than Sony ads. A lot of journalists have been asking whether Sony has been sending these peripherals out to die or something.

So what is the point to your stance?

Jealously that MS overshadows Sony in media? Frustration that Sony doesnt care enough? Anger that because of lack of marketing that Sony sends out great ideas to die?