Sal.Paradise said:
I'm pointing out your flawed reasoning over the semantics of "entitlement", and you know it. I'm sorry Archbrix I have absolutely zero idea where you've done that. You've told me it would be an 'injustice' if it didn't release on PS3 and now tell me about how that it would 'raise eyebrows' if it didn't release on that platform (that second part obviously true). But how on earth does that relate to PS3 gamers being 'entitled' to that game? How? |
*sigh*
Alright, this is my last response on the matter. You are absolutely right that the word "entitled" is not what Mr. Khan should have used, which I've already conceded. But again, his point goes deeper than the literal definition of the word.
I'm not accusing R* of hating Nintendo, if that's what you aim to accuse me of, and I'm not totally ruling it out either. What I'm saying is that if Ubisoft and Activision can bring their games to WiiU - which has an install base of zero (or 400,000+ if you count pre-orders) - there is no reason why R* can't port GTA5 to the console as well. Obviously R*/T2 want to make money, and based on what I've heard regarding how many copies they'd have to sell to make it a worthwhile endeavor, they would almost certainly be able to profit, and I think there's a good chance it'll come eventually.
