Nirvana_Nut85 said:
spurgeonryan said:
JoeTheBro said:
Well you are in the Obama club I'm assuming. Of course your opinion is sewed just like Romney's but in all fairness that last debate was really close and boring; no winner. |
I actually would like Gary Johnson, but see no point in wasting my vote on him. Obama is already in office and knows the ropes. Why wait for Romney to not do much different and have to wait for him to get situated with the position. Both are lose lose, but I would rather just stick with Obama. Half of his time in office was dealing with The Bush's mistakes, and the other half was spent making some of his own. I do not think he has done too bad of a job. Do you not think that Health care needs an over haul? Do you really think if Romney was President these past four year that he could have done much of anything different?
|
Gary Johnson would be miles ahead of Obama and Romney and honestly not voting for him is a mistake. Were sold the B.S idea that voting for a third party is throwing away your vote when in fact, not voting third party and supporting the lesser of two evils is why our world is in the sad state that it has reached .
This is also why I shake my head at all the idiots on the Republican side who could have voted for Ron Paul and didn't because the media successfully shoved the idea down there throats that he could not win. (Watching the presidential debates, we damn well know that if Romeny faired well against Obama, then Paul would have destroyed him)
|
I think it had less to do with the media and more to do with the fact that many people, Rep/Dem/Ind, don't agree with his foriegn policies. That and he goes around claiming that if he were in office, 9/11 would DEFINITELY not have happened.
