You have a lot of standards vic.
Vita is just not the system for you.
What else don't you like?
Jrpgs?
I see these kinds of threads on 4chan all the time and its not only lame, it's bias.
people start threads saying "give me a recommendation for psp that isn't a third person game, or rpg."
They pretend, as you do, that your requisites (citing this thread) are fair and balanced.
The problem is that these people account their own preferences as a metric for success as you do.
As I've proposed, many consoles don't rely or reuire big third party games early in their lifetime. People don't often buy consoles based on third party. They buy based on library, which is your first mistaken assumption regarding success.
Ps3 didnt. 360 didnt. Wii didnt.
in truth, vita has a good lineup coming out, but it doesnt meet your metrics. That's the problem. You're not a part of their target audience. To someone like me, their lineup is great and it doesnt matter who makes it.
Your second problem, is your assumption that a lack of third party games slated for q3 means sony is doing poorly with the vita, notwithstanding that most of those big games were pushed up to q2 instead.
Your next mistake is assuming that third party non exclusives not being announced at this time for q3 means that none will release, period. It further ignores that sony first party and ports are stacked in those months.
In two months, this thread might not even be factually true anymore. It's a very time sensitive thread.
There's a lot of problems in this thread, but it's not qith things i've been saying, it's with assumptions you've been making that in some cases haven't even been historically true.
