By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immortal said:


No need to obsess so much with the semantics. Even if I said I was looking for what "people" would respond to me, I'm evidently looking for someone to argue with their own logic anyway. Can you actually not tell, :P?

With that out of the way, isn't it clear that people are having double standards if they think that I'm an inhumane psychopath for killing a dog, but are alright if I kill chickens for a living? I already presented my logic in the previous post. Do you disagree?


Sure, it's a huge double standard. That's one of the reasons why I made this thread. Killing a dog is bad, but killing a cow is fine. I wanted people to acknowledge their inconsistencies, even if they weren't going to change. For the people that would acknowledge their double standards, I was expecting someone to say "Killing any animal is bad." However, you surprised me and said "Killing any animal is not bad." I guess that is more consistent, but still shocking nonetheless.

Also, something tells me you don't really feel that way about animals. You just wanted to tackle people's double standards. Am I right?