S.T.A.G.E. said:
slowmo said:
PS Plus is excellent value if you want to play the free games, if you don't then there is no value to a perceived customer. It's the same argument for Gold that some people depending on their habits will see value where as others will not.
Not sure why you all have to have some childish argument over which is better PSN Plus or Gold, they're vastly different products being sold under different circumstances. I wouldn't get enough time to take advantage of PSN Plus so it's of no value to me personally but that doesn't make it a worthless service as I appreciate it's a great service for those that use it. |
Theres no equality, if there was a PSN Plus on the 360 it would become another tier service, like a Platinum. You know Microsoft could stand to make a little more doing something like this on live. This way you pay like $100 for the whole package of being able to use your own online connection and top tier perks. :)
|
I agree they're just not remotely similar besides the fact they are subscription based services. I think Microsoft could perhaps offer something different to the current Gold fees and I wouldn't be surprised to see them learn from what Sony is offering next gen and have a two tier Live system. I can see a budget online gaming option and a premium option for bonus media and gaming goodies next gen. Sony have certainly showed there are other models that can be used to generate revenue.
