Mr Khan said:
The VAT as a replacement for corporate tax would be the better replacement, bringing in more revenue by catching all overseas companies that do business in America without imposing more of a burden on the ones that are here (maybe slightly more, as the VAT would be calculated to roughly bring in the same revenue as the current corporate rate, but without loopholes), and that excess revenue could work to help retraining programs for victims of outsourcing. |
Oh a VAT would work fine. Since it's basically saying "You will pay for the priveledge of using our consumer base no matter where you are."
The rest of it though... just are awful ideas that would boomerang so fast it'd make your head spin.
As I recall, a democratic senator did the numbers once and said something like a 5% VAT corporate VAT could replace revenue, completely fund Obamacare or a better healthcare system and help pay down the debt.
It's crazy to have free trade, and then only charge those who create jobs in your country taxes.
Right now all the loopholes are a huge problem. Which I imagine is why Mitt Romney says he wants to get rid of them anwyay.
Right now all the tax loopholes benefit a few companies, while tons more pay the uncompetitive 32% corporate tax rate or close too it.
New buisnesses that don't file as individuals pretty much have no choice.
It's another reason why new buisnesses get bought out instead of grow.