Kasz216 said:
It's like asking smeone to prove that the consitution views asians as human beings.
|
Problems arise when you start granting personhood to corporations. The way they are structured, ownership that makes decisions, isn't liable for what the entities they own doing bad things, so there is risks of these entities doing really bad things. Secondarily, these entities, as they are now, exist independently of anyone in them. They exist on paper and end up outlasting everyone who is part of them. For profit corporations also exist for making money as their goal. Because of this, corporations have properties that do not make them people. They only have rights because they are granted them by the state, because they exist as state-created entities. They don't exist in nature, and aren't endowed by God with "certain inalienable rights".
In short, they function differently than a group of people do, who attempt to do things together at a certain point and time. And on the first amendment, the right to assemble is given to individuals, not groups. Corporations don't have a right to vote either.
The rights of groups, as far as they go in the Constitution, are merely extensions of rights given to individuals.