Mr Khan said:
Kasz216 said:
In the middle east? It's probably more likely then you'd expect.
Espiecally in a country that just had it's government overthrown by a bunch of random armies with weapons.
Though granted... to bring it to the consulate would suggest some level of premediation no doubt.
However though... if say, instead of that an angry mob just overwhelmed and killed someone. I wouldn't call that terrorism i'd call that mob violence and prosecute it through the normal justice system, and not arrest people for terrorism.
|
We're misunderstanding each other. I'm not saying to change the legal definition, but i am saying that it would be okay to call such things "terror," since mob violence is a form of terror in the sense that it generally achieves the same ends as "terrorism" and generally with a similar motive, just a different execution.
|
You specifically used the direct term of terrorism twice. Which is a totally different thing.