theprof00 said:
Kasz216 said:
theprof00 said:
don't care, kasz.
I read the transcript, and it appears to me that in English, while not specifically calling it that, the context provides that he was referring to it, otherwise there was no point to bring up terrorism or trangressors save for brining up the anniversary of 9/11 which just so happened was in no way related to what he was talking about except for sharing the same date.
|
Well... you'd be wrong on that context.
to quote the Washington Post.
(Note: we added this statement to the timeline after Josh Gerstein of Politico asserted that the phrasing “acts of terror” showed Obama acknowledged “terrorism” was behind the attack. From our many years of covering diplomacy we would say there is a world of difference, but readers can draw their own conclusions.)
Killer phrased it awfully, but the term "act of terror" has never been an exclusive term for terrorism and generally has been used to mean "fucked up shit." Things like Assad using helicopters on his own citizens are seen as "acts of terror" but clearly aren't terrorism because Assad is the state.
|
>_>
My only complaint is that this is going to be the only thing talked about, when Obama literally pulled down romney;s pants and spanked him tonight :D
|
while i disagree that obama spanked him, actually i think romney did slightly better (shocking, i know)
but this is actually a good thing for obama, as it looks like romney was flat out wrong, and a doofus. because candy wrongly corrected him, and the audience cheered.
i read this too i thought it was funny: "if they were truly undecided voters, they were apparetnly undecided between president obama and the green party"
