Kasz216 said:
to quote the Washington Post. (Note: we added this statement to the timeline after Josh Gerstein of Politico asserted that the phrasing “acts of terror” showed Obama acknowledged “terrorism” was behind the attack. From our many years of covering diplomacy we would say there is a world of difference, but readers can draw their own conclusions.)
Killer phrased it awfully, but the term "act of terror" has never been an exclusive term for terrorism and generally has been used to mean "fucked up shit." Things like Assad using helicopters on his own citizens are seen as "acts of terror" but clearly aren't terrorism because Assad is the state. |
>_>
My only complaint is that this is going to be the only thing talked about, when Obama literally pulled down romney;s pants and spanked him tonight :D









