killerzX said:
something apparrently foreign to you. as i have posted what obama said. and people with basic understandings of english can see at no point did he call the attack on the embessy a torror attack. In fact he alludes to the anti-muhammed video being to blame. and ommits the word terror every time he he mention the libyia attack. |
That was AFTER this first statement.
There is only one thing you are right about here, that he did not specifically say "this was an act of terror".
What he did say was "we will not tolerate acts of terror. Today we bury four of our best. We will not let this stop us from prsuing justice, and finding the people responsible".
If he was talking about a riot, why would he refer to the people as if they were an entity? If he was talking about a riot, why would he say, tonight, that he said he called it an act of terror. He allowed Romney to say other things that weren't true. Why would he vehemently be against what Romney said if he didn't say it? Was he TRYING to make himself look like a liar? No. He said tonight that he called it an act of terror because he himself believed to be implying it when he said it.









