By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 on 17 October 2012
Edit Thread
killerzX said:
theprof00 said:
killerzX said:
Oh here's something BIg. Candy Crowly just admitted she was WRONG. in correcting Romney. She admitted that.

I know accept your apologies.

But she didn't, I just saw the video, she said she knows the quote and though eh didn't specifically refer to it as exactly saying "this was an act of terror", republicans are going to try to parse the meaning of what he said....which is exactly what you're doing.


i posted the transcript. it shows he infered the video was to blame, and it show his 1 lone mention of the word "terror" was in a general sense in the context of 9/11 which is what he mentioned right before. 

And my interpretation of that makes much more sense than you guys saying he was saying the attacks were terrorist attack. because in the other white house press release the same day, makes no mention of terror, and again alludes the the video being to blame, like his speech. So that makes twice the allude to the video as to blame. then in the days following HE and his administation denied it being a terror attack, and instead again blamed the video, over and over.

its quite clear, he wasnt talking about bengazi being a terror attack, as his speech had numerous opportunities to qualify the word attak with terror yet did not. as i showed already. He also alluded to the video in the speech. then in another white house release they again dont mention terror, yet again blame the video. 

 

and here is she admitting she was wrong.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/16/cnns_candy_crowley_romney_was_actually_right_on_libya.html

I'm done.

I tricked you into thinking I was calling you a republican using English.
You then can't admit that using the exact same English means he was referring to that.

I just don't know what more to explain.

Your link is even worse. Look at my response to crazy.
in teh debate she says, "you are both right, Obama, you did refer to it as an act of terror, and Romney you are right that he also said for two weeks it was called a demonstration. Both of you are right"

Then in your link she says "I knew there was a question about libya so I read up on it. I knew that Obama said it was an act of terror, but I also said Mitt was right about it being called a demonstration afterwards"

She literally admitted no wrongdoing, she just said exactly what happened. It is simply being presented as if she did.