Crazymann said:
You know... I totally agree with your forum avatar, and I won't be voting for Mittrack O'Bomney, so I care not who won, but... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/16/cnns_candy_crowley_romney_was_actually_right_on_libya-comments.html |
except she doesn't admit that he never said it. She says in the video "romney is right when he says for 14 days it was called a demonstration, but it is also true that obama referred to it as an act of terror".
Right in the debate she confirmed what both candidates were saying.
What's so hard to understand:
Even in the link video she says "i knew there was a quesiton on libya, so I reread everything. I knew he said "we will not let acts of terror shaken our country etc", but I also conceded in the moment that Mitt was also right when he says that the administration says tehre was a demonstration for 2 weeks"
I'm really dumbfounded as to how this is so inexplicably hard to understand.
In the debate, she says, 'Barack called it an act of terror, so he's right about that, but you governor are also right about the demonstration part', then in the link you provided she repeats what happened.
I'm so confused that this is being called an apology. Right in the debate she said BOTH were right!
Is this real life?
