| killerzX said: exactly so you agree with me. he didnt call it an act of terror. he said acts of terror wont shake our resolve" soo, he just saying acts of terror wont shake us. he wasnt calling the bengazi thing a terrorist attack. He went on talk show the days after and flat out refused to call it a terrorist attack. his adminastation blamed the video. i cant believe you guys are actually debating this fact. if he did call it a terror attack in the rose garden, why did he then back track and give out a complete opposite claim |
Ok Killerz, the problem here is that Obama did mention the attack in a general kind of way as an act of terror. That is a fact and Romney got caught concentrating on the wrong thing. It is pretty much indisputable that Obama referenced it as a terrorist attack.
However, you and Romney are correct in saying that Obama would later back track that and go out and deny it being a terrorist attack. He went on for like two weeks after that referring to the event as a demonstration. Honestly, I think that is even more inexcusable because he would of had more facts by then.
The only reason Romneys attack floundered here is because he focused on the wrong part, he should have gone after some of the stuff Obama said later on, not the day after.
