the_dengle said:
You are being ridiculous. Why would he suddenly bring up acts of terror if he did not consider the attack itself an act of terror? It would be a total non sequitur. Like talking about the embassy attack and suddenly saying, "and the deer population in the tristate area is completely out of control." You expect us to believe that he simply felt like making a point about acts of terror even though he didn't think the situation had anything to do with terror? Stop being dumb. You can dislike Obama as much as you want, but at least be honest with yourself about the words coming out of the guy's mouth. |
read my post with his entire speech. it answers your questions. and makes more sense than your claim. you claim doesnt make sense because the days after this speech he denyed it being an act of terror. he blamed the video.
