2nd debate, who won? Obama or Romney?

[theprof00]

killerzX said:

spaceguy said:

killerzX said:

spaceguy said:

killerzX said:

JGarret said:
Can´t wait to see Foxnews´ tears about Candy calling out Romney.

you do realize she was wrong. obama didnt call it a terrorist attack in the rose garden. in fact in the days following attack he kept mention the video as the reason. he went on shows with joy behar, univision, etc. saying it was the video.

so candy was wrong. also its not her job to interject, or add her own "fact checking"

He said it was a terror act. SO you are wrong.

 

that is simply a lie. he did not, and it wouldnt make any sense if he did because he in the following days said it was a demonstration caused by a video, he sent out susan rice to claim it was a demonstration caused by a video. if he thought it was a terror attack, and admitted to it, why did they then go out a claim it was because a video for weeks following.

what you said is flat out wrong.

I forget you believe everything fox news says. Why did I even comment on your post. It's pointless. You have no clue.

what did fox news say? 

i have listened to what obama said in the rose garden, i have the transcript. he did not say it was a terror attack. and if he had said that, why would he latter contridict himself a say it was a demonstration caused by a video. why did he send out Rice to say the same.

you are lying

Our job isn't to tell you why what happened. You are being told to believe something and you are choosing to believe it. I don't know everything concerning the events you are saying specifically happened, but here we have specifics.

Romney said he waited to call it an act of terror. Obama said it the day after it happened. Obama also said tonight that he had investigators sent out to find out what happened. Somewhere in there Rice fits in, and somewhere in there the video fits in, but facts are facts. He said it, and for some reason, another person said it was a demonstration. It's not our job to tell you what caused that statement to be changed. Your media stations job is to make you believe that it is a contradiction, but so far I see this line of history.

The act happens. Obama calls it an act of terror. He sends out investigators to find out what happened exactly. Days later, Rice says it was a demonstration.

Maybe someone is lying, maybe someone is just wrong, but it's quite a leap to go and say 1, that Obama never said something that he did, and 2, say that he's a hypocritie, or saying contradictory things because his investigator and himself are different people.