killerzX said:
Mr Khan said:
HappySqurriel said:
| Mr Khan said:
Given all of the actually murdered abortion doctors out there, i'd say its the conservatives who are carrying out more of the political violence.
|
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77292.html
Conservative bloggers are the new targets of a series of “SWAT-ing” attacks — a decade-old hoax used to draw a SWAT team to the door of a political enemy.
It’s a bizarre series of events that’s consuming prominent conservative web sites, pitting conservative writers against a former federal convict — or his backers — who says he isn’t even familiar with SWAT-ing: an elaborate practical joke in which SWAT teams are falsely sent to someone’s home after a violent crime is reported. Those behind the SWAT-ing often mask their actual phone numbers, making the calls appear to originate from within the victim’s home.
...
“There’s been hundreds of SWAT-ing instances where SWAT teams have come up to innocent third parties,” he said. “It’s putting innocent people at risk. It’s just a matter of time that we believe someone could get hurt.”
In the current hyper partisan political environment it is dangerous to speak out publicly, and the only reason to do so is if you will gain personally from doing so.
|
That's not violence, that's a prank.
|
okay how about the fact that pretty much any conservative speaker has to get an armed detail, every time they go to an university. or people like rush limbaugh needs a bomb squad on call. pretty much an conservative talk show host/personality needs full time security.
or just look at the difference between occupy and tea party rallies. one is a peaceful civilized event the other a rat hole, drug filled, rape/murder/steal every other dat event.
|
Do they actually use those armed details, though?
Is there evidence of a conservative personality getting physically attacked?
