By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pezus said:
irstupid said:
sales2099 said:
Therein lies the problem...if the desired consumer is a PS3 owner, why would you offer them console experiences on a handheld when they already have those experiences on a big tv?


This ^

 

Been saying this since day 1 vita was unveiled, and when PSP was unvieled.  Unless its a device you already have and its free cross play or whatever its all called is pointless.  Nobody buys multiple systems so they can play the same game on it.  You will buy only 1 call of duty, or madden, ect.  If you already have a vita and you can play it on it for FREE then its amazing.  But no-one goes out and buys the same game for 2 systems.  

PSP managed to correct this with some unique games later in life, but it also had a much better start.  I'm not sure if developers will give the Vita an oppertunity due to its slow start and low userbase.  

Actually the best thing for the PSP might have been the ps3.  Cause then there was a difference in teh games.  The Vita might need the PS4 to distinguish itself.  

Flawed logic, considering people buy Mario on both Wii and 3DS...CoD Declassified is not the same game as Blops 2, neither is AC: Liberation the same as AC3

They based their argument on that the games are releasing at the same time that home consoles... But every year You see a Assasin's creed and COD on home consoles.. when will release a Vita version of those games if not soon before Holidays when people spend more money?!...



 

DoYou Want DOZENS OF NO GAEMZ?! then... Visit the Official PlayStation Vita Tread