By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dahuman on 16 October 2012
Edit Thread
forevercloud3000 said:
dahuman said:

wtf you have a PSP game on your list lol, don't even bring BC into this one :P I'm really surprised that you don't have Bravely Default listed since you seem to like SE stuff, I'd rather play that than something like FF X since I've already played FF X like 2x before. I also take it that you've never played the Ace Attorney series, not to mention your list is also one of those we've all seen it before in general list as well o_O; You are not exactly making good argument with your list at all although I think Soul Sacrifice looks really cool.


I have seen Bravely Default, the art style interests me and the fact it is more traditional.EDIT: I saw some early videos and it all seemed really basic but I just discovered a newer one and it does look really good. Reminds me a bit of Golden Sun, a series I really liked so If I had the chance I would get that as well.

FF Type-0(If that is what you mean) will never hit US PSPs due to the way it was made and piracy. It has been hinted to be coming to Vita instead for a while now and it would be the only way to get it over here. The rest are all main Vita titles.

I have not played Ace Attorney but have watched enough of it by roommate to know its not my thing exactly. Love the idea of lawyer game and what not but something about it comes off too ridiculous for me.

I find it funny that  some are very dismissive of Vita's library when it has so many great titles releasing for it soon, and even more in the future. The first thing that comes out of their mouths is it is ridden with Ports(which isn't any more true than 3DS is) and that all of it's games are better suited on console blah blah. I think I would need explaining on how portable mario is any different than what you can have in a console mario? Very little difference if any, and that is OK. There is nothing wrong with that but the fanboy goggles clouds ppl's judgment. The better graphics and strong CPU of Vita just means we no longer need dumbed down versions of games just to make them portable, and I like that. 3DS is capable of similar things and you are seeing that more and more with it's releases(Res:Revalations for one). This is not to say that simpler games are not wanted tho. Oh and the fact that some games are on both Vita and PS3 is a good thing in my eyes, the "never stop playing" idea is always what I wanted. And in some cases, I would have never thought to get a game on PS3...but would jump at it for Vita(Sly 4 for instance).

Nintendo is actually really good about that, you will find that Super Mario 3D Land is tailored towards a portable environment, it never takes long to complete a level unlike Mario Galaxy or Galaxy 2 yet it can be challenging, and there are a lot of levels that you can keep going back to. They really know what smart portable game design is, and you can clearly tell with a lot of their 3DS games that you never have to spend a long time to complete a level or 2, but that's really Nintendo alone in that department because they know what they are doing. I've never really had issues with console experiences on portables, I played the shit out of Birth by Sleep to 100% and other SE titles on PSP etc but I do have a problem with rehashs that are not really remakes (Tales re-releases in general, a lot of the FFs that are not actual remakes etc) because I think they should use their resources making new exciting games rather than wasting resources  unless they are doing complete awesome graphical overhaul remakes.

The problem right now is that the 3DS is simply too strong and dominant at a really good value, that's why Sony can't compete on the same level right now, they need to figure something out or the shit is going to hit the fan really fast.