pezus said:
You didn't give me a chance...you left me to die. Your unvote ensured a lynch...keeping your vote would not have ensured it. I don't get what is so difficult about this. You didn't irritate me, you just pulled a scummy move. I know you explained it, but you left it open for people like spurge to hammer quite easily. |
@Spurge. To be honest, I think this is a bit of a nothing response. But I will respond to each point so that the rest of the alive players can understand it
You didn't give me a chance...you left me to die. Your unvote ensured a lynch...keeping your vote would not have ensured it |
If i had left my vote on you, then you may very well have died. Someone could easily have unvoted Pezus, or scum could have voted you, and you would have died. I got a town read from your responses to Pezus and your accusations at him- if now with hindsight, misplaced. I couldn't take the risk of you dying, when i thought you town. If anything, my mistake was not voting Nacho, but as it was a two horse race with less then an hour to go, it wouldn't have mattered.
So I unvoted you. But I didn't vote Pezus so i could give him a chance to weasle out of it. Prof clearly saw this just after the night ended. If Linkz hadn't voted Pezus, Prof could have got it in early and saved him.
I know you explained it, but you left it open for people like spurge to hammer quite easily. |
I can't explain it any further then i already have. Doing so would be a futile effort. I was not anticipating someone to hammer it so soon, and even if they did, thats still 24 hours and plenty of time. I do not regret my timelimit vote or my Spurge unvote.
So hyped for Rome 2: Total War