Actually, I think the criticism was that there is a bunch of Marines in France guarding the french ambassador.
Yet no Marines in Libya, to guard the Libyan ambassador.
Which would be like having a security team at your bank, and posting them all in the break room and the bathroom while nobody is guarding the tellers or safe.
Take the pointless security in France, a country that SHOULD be able to protect our ambassador. Put said security Libya... a place with shakey security... at best...
Seems like a pretty common sense move. Not sure why anyone would defend such crappy security planning.
If there is anything wrong with American politics, it's the rush for "gotcha" moments without bothering to actually look at what people are saying and deconstructing their arguements.
