Nem said:
You're assuming the entitiy exists. That isnt proven. If the existance is not proven, then theres nothing to make us believe it exists. |
Fine, an entity's existence (or inexistence) is not dependent upon our ability to prove its existence. There were tons of concepts that we could not prove in the past. That doesn't mean those concepts were false. They simply weren't proven. What you're suggesting is that if we can't prove something, then its false. However, the moment we can prove that same thing, then it magically pops into existence. If that were true, then concepts and entities would pop into (and out of) existence constantly. Our reality would be constantly changing. That's not how reality works. Reality is independent to what we can and cannot prove.