fighter said:
you reply that there is a logic placing christianity ahead of others without specifying it... i imagine you must have compared quite some religions to finally come up with such an established position about the people who didn't choose christianity as their religion and, by your words, will not be saved, are children / handicapped / aborted babies / muslims / jewish / budhhists / atheists / agnostics / pagans / satanists / shintuists / etc. etc. and you still get that as logical ? My friend, there is no logic in your text, and i am not satan trying to push you from your righteous path, nor a jealous person that you might be save and i not. |
I think you are misunderstanding me. I'm not saying that Christianity is the only logical religion, or that it is logical. I'm saying that I believe a requirement for a religion being true is that it must be logical. I am also saying that I am studying the Bible to see for myself if it is logical or not. I have not claimed that it is logical, though I have claimed that it is more logical than many would lead you to believe. I still have problems with it, however.
However, within the context of Christianity, it is perfectly logical to say that only people who believe in Christ will be saved, as that's what the Bible says. I don't see how you can say that is not logical, within the context of the religion. You can argue that the religion itself is wrong, and I have not claimed that it is or is not wrong.