Max King of the Wild said:
|
Maybe i missed it... but i also saw a fact checker say Paul Ryan was wrong when he called the 6,500 number misleading... because the group who said it, in fact said it was 6,500.
Ignoring the fact that Paul Ryan wasn't disputing the 6,500 number... but that the 6,500 they reached was flawed in it's methodology.
Sort of like if I mentioned that Gregory said you were a liar about who your voting for. Then you said what gregory said was misleading... and then they decided in fact I was right because gregory said you were a liar.
Fact Checkers are all kinds of incompetent lately. At worst, they're partisian hacks now... at best, they ignore all relvent context in favor for a quick fact check that can be accomplished by google, rather then a deep analysis of the differing reports, why the reports differ, and in which cases you would expect said reports to be more accurate.








