Why Sony (Playstation) is not doomed

[slowmo]

Jay520 said:

slowmo said:

Jay520 said:

slowmo said:
So bleeding billions this last 6 years means all is fine with the PlayStation brand. You guys are starting to sound as misguided as Sega fans were towards the end. If drastic changes aren't made in strategy then yes they are in trouble, we will know more when the PS4 is released though.

Perhaps you didn't read the thread. No one here is asserting that Playstation isn't in trouble or doesn't need any changes. Most are saying that they won't be eliminated from the market in the foreseeable future.

Actually the OP is stating that the brand isn't in much trouble, perhaps you didn't read it?

No, it said the brand wasn't in as much trouble as some people think. By 'some people,' he's referring to people that say Playstation is doomed. I know this because he says so in the title and by this sentence which precedes the body of his article: " Here’s why I think Sony isn’t doomed, and why the PS4 is in a much better position than you might think:"

No where does he say, in absolute terms, that Sony is not in trouble. He's saying, in relation to some people, it's not in as much trouble as some people think. What he is saying in absolute terms is that Sony isn't doomed.

"I think a lot of it is understandable and some completely reasonable, but it’s a glass-half-empty perspective that’s largely unfair. Here’s why I think Sony isn’t doomed, and why the PS4 is in a much better position than you might think"

That's pretty clear to me that he's saying Sony isn't trouble and in fact the position is much better.  It's from the first paragraph.  The definitive statement is the bolded section.  He is pretty clearly saying that he can understand why people think Sony are in trouble but he will not conceed the point they are because he states it's "largely unfair".  That my friend is as absolute as you get imo.