happydolphin said:
In the works, meaning, signed? Also, what did you think of my last post? |
Sorry, scrolled down too fast :P
It was just speculation of discussions; that a contract could have been getting laid out, more from observing Sony. As for your last post, the issue of it being California didn't even occur to me. I'm so used to thinking of Indiana specific loopholes. Yeah that could be problematic, but aren't there specific exceptions for situations involving trade secrets and partnerships? There's no way every non-compete agreement is dismissed... hmm, I'll look into that later when I have more time. As for hurting their credibility. As long as they have evidence, each claim should have fair representation (edit: theoretically, I suppose it could). It's just less hassle and money.
Now it is time for a power-nap.
