'That isn't Kevin Butler', Bridgestone claims

[IvorEvilen]

J_Allard said:

IvorEvilen said:

 

Edit:  I do have one last closing remark.  I've seen people commenting on the frivolity of this case.  What is the point of a contract and a team of lawyers if you aren't going to use them?  A contract is intended to protect both parties should one side break the contract, not just the little guy.

His contract had expired. Which makes this 0 about breach of contract and 100% about Sony being butt hurt that their former employee did an ad somewhat related to the Wii.

Umm, non-compete clauses could go on for years after the relationship is physically over.  There is also speculation that they had another contract in the works (note, speculation, not fact).