My answer isn't supported.
I'm not voting for either.
Obama has set more dangerous precedents in office then even Bush did. There is a reason why Nader calls Obama a war criminal and for some reason has taken the "romney" side as of late, despite calling Romney "a corporation masquerading as a person."
Good article from the super liberal Magazine "The Atlantic" explains it pretty well. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/why-i-refuse-to-vote-for-barack-obama/262861/?google_editors_picks=true
"I don't see how anyone who confronts Obama's record with clear eyes can enthusiastically support him. I do understand how they might concluded that he is the lesser of two evils, and back him reluctantly, but I'd have thought more people on the left would regard a sustained assault on civil liberties and the ongoing, needless killing of innocent kids as deal-breakers."
Romney hasn't spoken against those precedents. That's enough for me to not vote for him as well.
So i'm voting either Gary Johnson or Jill Stein, I assume Jill Stein spoke out about this shit.
