richardhutnik said:
Expectation management is part of it, and what you said could be a possibility. I am not sure, in the day of the Internet, where all you have to do is google to get info, if the debates really do much. So not sure why there would be much of a game changer out of it. So, what can be said is true. The goal is to win elections, and debates, at best, have some sort of unindentifiable possible impact on the election that isn't quanitifiable. The debates aren't sporting events, which produce won-loss records. In 2004, GW Bush was pretty bad in a number of debates, and people though Kerry won. It didn't have an impact on the end result. Kerry still lost. |
I don't know if that is quite fair. Historically, debates have been shown to have an impact on public opinion, from minimal to huge. I mean, just look at how the debates affected the republican primaries this year. They had a huge impact on the primary process and were essential to the rise and fall of several candidates.
Whether or not this debate will have an impact is yet to be seen, but the possibility of debates having a large impact is there. Even in this age of internet access.







