| dsgrue3 said: Dysgraphia applies only to handwriting. It's a spatial thing. It would not effect your ability to comprehend information, so obviously you are suffering from some other disorder...or you are lying. Grammar* 1) No. Look it up. 2) The terms were not used prior. 3) Yes. And? |
No it doesn't.
Dysgraphia primarily effects handwriting. It also effects grammar.
I'm guessing you did a quick incomplete 5 second google search on Dysgraphia.
1) Look what up? You just admitted you were wrong and that This was legal before the bill passed.. Outside which Wells Fargo offered financial servies in 1986. Banks could offer both investment and savings options WELL before GLB in 1999. The only things they couldn't do... Was merge banks. and Insurance underwriting.(Which they mostly still don't.)
So Wells Fargo COULD offer investment banking options... but what it COULDN'T do was buy small investment banks and merge them with wells fargo to do their investing for them.
What your mistakenly thinking of is likely the Citibank/Travelers insurance merger. Which was illegal until the bill passed... but they let it go, because such legislation was SO overwhelmingly popular it was going to pass. If Citibank wanted to create a travelers insurance type system from scratch? Perfectly legal.
When GBL passed, what happened was, the big banks consolidated. This made them "too big to fail." That was what is disliked about the GBL. (to people who know what the GBL did anwyay.)
2) Gramm Leach Bliley most certaintly was.
3) And... nothing. Saving big banks = less competiton. Espiecally when you pass laws that require mountains of lawyers to piece through that apply to everyone even though it was only the "too big" banks that were a problem. (That and CRA exacerbation. Which is ignored by Democrats though.)
