By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mike_intellivision said:

Interesting study. I imagine that you would probably find the same in reverse in many business schools and some economics departments -- particularly those that espouse public choice theory.   (Related to this, I wonder if there is self-selection bias on the part of people who pick particular disciplines of study, based upon the "belief system" of that discipline.)

Also, while I only skimmed the study, it was not clear to me if the "discrimination" would be the result of differences in political philosophy or differences from the theory norm of the discipline (which I am fully willing to admit may espouse a particular political philosophy). This difference thought would be one of semantics, not of results. And it would limit the true discussion on the nature of many issues.

Mike from Morgantown

Actually... I think most economics departments also tend to skew liberal... despite most economists being conservative.


It's led to quite the split between Academic and Private research and outlook.

 

Most Academic Economics now mostly looks at abstract theoretical questions, while Private economists focus on actual practical real world economics.

It's why you can have people like Paul Krugman when a Nobel Prize... yet not actually have any sort of understanding on how markets actually work on a mecanical level.  Instead relying on overly simple equations that suggust cure all solutions only when used in aggregate.

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/07/26/a-great-divide-holds-back-the-relevance-of-economists/

 


It's intersting, because often you'll find when someone shifts from one realm to the other, they also tend to shift accordingly when it comes to the right or left of economic beliefs.