Dgc1808 said:
Mr Khan said:
Dgc1808 said:
@The Evil Cole hate
1) Seth Killian has confirmed that the two Coles only share about 25% of their moveset.
2) If you've played inFamous 2, you'd know that those two can't simply be combined into one. It just wouldn't look right. Also, the serious wouldn't be properly represented with just 1 of the 2 Coles.
EDITED
|
A Zelda/Sheik thing would make more sense there, however, than having two discrete characters.
|
What do you mean by zelda/sheik thing? Being able to switch between them at anytime? Because that wouldn't make sense if you've played inFamous. "Hero" Cole would have to do a huge amount of negative things just to get down to "thug" Cole, much less "inFamous" Cole. It's not as simple as switching clothing, hair style and using some concealed weapons. Being able to switch on the fly just wouldn't be true to the character. Also, I do consider Zelda and Sheik as two different characters.
|
First of all, I've never played inFamous, but I do get your point. However, how much 'sense' do you need in a brawler game, is seriously that bad to add a "Zelda/Shriek" alternative? Not sharing moves is a nice add, tho.
OT: I don't buy many PS3 games, but I was following this one. It does look meh, unless again you are a big fan.
Don't jump on Selnor, eventhough he poorly express his opinion and his post are flame bait, he kind of has a point. When the game was announced, people defended the idea stating that under the Sony umbrella there were many characters to pick. And, it doesn't look that numerous, actually it appears they struggled to complete that list (read Good/Evil Cole).
There will be unlockables, they probably have mentioned that all characters would be available at the beggining, but they can't just leave the rooster at that size. Or DLC, hopefully free.
VicViper said:
Oh, Kaz
|
Lol
