I appreciate your thoughts, Ail.
In regard to taxes, he has stated that "removing loopholes" will generate more revenue. I agree with you, that is incredibly vague, but bears some credence. If you remove deductions (loopholes), you are essentially increasing taxes. It is cleverly-worded to avoid stating that he will raise taxes.
We're complaining about China because we cannot compete with their essential slave-labor. That's really to what it boils down. Need to incentivize manufacturing in the US if we want to promote its growth here.
I absolutely understand your and other Americans' distrust of Romney. I cannot state that I disagree. I just view it from the perspective of one proven, failed presidency over another untested candidate whom happens to have a background in venture capitalism and job creation. From there, my choice is clear.
Sidenote: Global warming has evidence, but the evidence is from such a brief period of time in the history of the Earth that it is pretty nescient to consider it proven, much less equate it to "2+2 = 4."







