Is a 3/10 for a game like Resident Evil 6 justifiable?

[TruckOSaurus]

happydolphin said:

TruckOSaurus said:

darkknightkryta said:
I think any less than a 5 means the game is unplayable.

There are very few unplayable games out there, certainly not enough to reserve half the point scale for them.

But it doesn't work that way. The scale is 1 to 10, for all games, regardless of how populated some zones are. Demonstrated: all games could be 90-100% worthy, would you then spread those over a 1 to 10 scale? It doesn't work like that.

Also, there is preference, and then there is quality. Something can be of high quality though one may not prefer it. Whether that person prefers it or not should just have a portion of the total judgement, and a lesser one to the objective measure. That's how a title of utmost quality could reasonably get a 7, but not much less.

Yeah I agree that my logic didn't work there, half the point scale shouldn't equal half the games but I still think that defining anything below 5 as unplayable crams too much games in the upper echelons. Especially, if a person is rating a game mainly by how much they enjoyed it.