Jay520 on 28 September 2012
| ninetailschris said: The argument falls when you you make the argument that assumes he doesn't know x at all. This goes against the very definition omniscient. There is no argument to assume he doesn't know anything and seems to be very circular coming from your mind and not actual reality of the definition. If I knew everything it would be incoherent to say that I don't know something. It's like saying is possible to eat 5 if you can't eat 5 then you can't eat everything. |
But it cannot know if it doesn't know. No being can know if there exists things which it doesn't know.
