SlayerRondo said:
1: And how would you feel if the cafeteria offered only high fat food and told you to bring you're own healthy meals from home instead of offering something for you. 2: Whats wrong with people wanting to eat regular food niether healthy or un-healthy? People who do get physical exercise and eat reasonable should be able to get a normal lunch and not have to stick with healthy options they dont like. 3: The government wont be contributing to the rising obesity rate if they just offered normal lunches but they are forcing a healthy policy on children who should not have to be super healthy at the expense of enjoying their food. 4: And kids skipping out on lunch and falling asleep in class from lack of energy is such a great alternative. |
It is interesting that people complaining about the government doing this, and not allowing the kids to have what they want, protests when the schools do give kids condoms so they don't get pregnant or catch STDs.
As far as your first point goes, only high fat foods is what they have been offering. If you wanted to eat healthy, you had to bring from home. Budgets are limited, so they can't do the full gambit. Schools actually had fast food places coming in and serve what they are doing.
As far as the second point, the initiative also involves trying to get kids physical exercise. The constraints by the government are healthier foods and limiting lunch to 750-850 calories.







