Jay520 said:
2.) You're changing goals. Now, you're saying Home and Live merely have similarities. But earlier, you were saying " Home was suppose to be the equivalent of Xbox live" Funny how you go from "being the equivalent to Xbox live" to saying they "both have similarities and differences." So are you agreeing that your earlier statement (that Home was suppose to be the equivalent of Xbox live) is false? 3.) This is starting to become funny Here is You saying that Home is a failure because it doesn't appeal to mainstream gamers: you telling me that Home was not meant for mainstream gamers? Well no wonder it didn't make any money. No wonder it is a failure and fit for a small minority Here is me saying that just because it's not for mainstream gamers doesn't mean it's a failure: Not appealing to mainstream =/= failure and didn't make any money. You're trying to equate "fitting for a small minority" to "being a failure." That's simply not true. Here is You denying that you ever said Home is a failure because it doesn't appeal to mainstream gamers: I never said that. Here is Me quoting you when you said because Home isn't meant for, then it's a failure : You just said " Ha ha, you telling me that Home was not meant for mainstream gamers? Well no wonder it didn't make any money. No wonder it is a failure and fit for a small minority that think it's better to do the virtual running man and watch Sony movie trailers all day than play actaul games." Now, here is You saying Home is a failure because it doesn't appeal to mainstream gamers: gamHome is a failure, and thus, not profitable because it never appealed to the mainstream gamers |
lol, you can't be serious. Stop wasting my time, please. In fact, just learn to Comprehend while your're Reading people's posts.
Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren
I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.








