badgenome said:
Care to show where sticking things in the federal budget is the only way to care about them? Once more: "Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain." - Frederic Bastiat |
Here is a reality about the government: It grows and does more, whenever the body politic demands a problem get addressed and it fails to act of its own collective will, to address issues. So, let's look at this more in general. Care to show the Paul Ryan solution to ending training people to fish? Sorry, but, proposing nothing and presuming that the issue of getting people trained will take care of itself is not a solution, it is neglect.
What is YOUR solution to getting people taught to fish? Care to name what they should train in, and how they will pay for it? If you can't do that, you neither care to give a man to fish, or teach him how to fish. You would rather he die of neglect via starvation. Hey, we need to cull down the incompetent losers after all. Drive them to kill themselves and then lower taxes.
