DaRev said:
1) It's over ambitious because it attemps to create a whole social world outside of regular gaming. You have your own home/appartment, you go to the movies, to the arcade, and whole lot of other stuff, all outside of regular gaming. Sony it seems expected people to stop gaming and go socialize in Home, that sounds over ambitious to me. Plus if Home was suppose to be the equivalent of Xbox live, then it does seem over ambitious as Live presents a much simpler means of gamer interaction with each other. 2) Both Home and Vitual boy failed to apeal to mainstream gamers, I don't know anyone of my friends that use home (or a Virtual Boy). Even the Sony fans I know never use it. Maybe you know a lots of Xbox and Wii fabs that do, but I don't 3) Automatically, no, but it's an indication. |
"Sony it seems expected people to stop gaming and go socialize in Home, that sounds over ambitious to me"
lol so sony the manufacturer of the GAMES console which runs home wanted people to stop playing games?
"if Home was suppose to be the equivalent of Xbox live"
doesn't it seem a bit nonsensical to you to compare home to live?... wouldn't it make more sense to compare psn to live?
"Both Home and Vitual boy failed to apeal to mainstream gamers"
when was it said that home was targetted at mainstream gamers?







