Mr Khan said:
In part. It may well be that our state courts rule the law is constitutionally valid, but has to be suspended for this election because it will be impossible for PENNDOT or the State Department to get everyone supplied in time. I am opposed to the laws because their intent is malevolent, and because the laws are unfeasible against the realities of the day (which the people proposing these laws *know,* hence the malevolence). At the end of the day i do support some sort of national ID system, something that could serve as an all-in-one or something |
Fair enough.
While I support the voter ID laws, I don't think they should apply until the next election.
I don't think ANY voter law should apply to the election most current.
Also, I don't really see the laws as manevelont in nature... considering that Voter Id laws used to be a bi-partisian issue that democrats backed away from. That it might be that it will "deliver romney penslyvania" likely does in fact mean by stopping rampant voter fraud.
The most recent voter fraud issues have pretty much all dealt with Acorn signing up false people, and democratic leaning places ending up with more votes then registered voters.
That's why the politics of it break down like it does.
Afterall, why did Delware post voter ID laws despite being heavily democratic?
Likely because it's something practically eveyrone wants, and voter fraud won't help there.