HappySqurriel said:
While the concept of the test is interesting, the approach is pretty terrible ... They should have created a dropping rig that would drop the devices in a consistent fashion and used multiple phones. I understand why they didn't do this (after all that would be expensive) but it means that I wouldn't really trust their findings like I would trust the work of an organization like Consumer Reports. |
Yeah, it's not scientific. But you can find plenty of such tests on youtube, and they all end up with the same result. Which is that the iPhone 5 is a more resistant phone.







