SamuelRSmith said:
You assume the average voter follows this shit. Let's be honest, they don't. Most voters go by name recognition only. The hope is that by the time the Presidential debates come up, a few people will suddenly engage. I know this is what happened in the UK... the vast majority of people I know, decided who they were going to vote for, based on the party leader debates (which is one of the reasons why the Lib Dems performed so well) |
I wasn't trying to upplay the other stuff, just downplay the chance of the debates making a difference. Debates work usually to take someone down, and make them feel unsecure about them. I don't see where they will do anything for Romney to establish anything differently than what people see about him now. In the United States, gaffes usually eliminate candidates, not settle things, unless the issue is a candidate not sure they have intellectual fiber. I don't believe that Romney has a Palin issue of not being seen as smart. He is seen more as having a consistency and character issue, and a need for likeability.
The election in the United States is that Obama should lose, if a candidate on the GOP side could capture the imagination and have charisma and likeability Reagan had. Romney lacks this, so I am hard pressed to see exactly what Romney could do to establish himself.