chocoloco said:
Look your trying to come out and say my source is greater than any other and that is not really a valid arguement just because you believe that. Obviously, the media is biased and no poll is ever without error. No poll can account for all the reason it will be off that is why a plus or minus level of error is required and mandatory. Just because you name a few reasons the polls would be off does not take away the value of polls done by Rausmen and many others partly because sources of error usually cannot be explained so clearly as you are trying to claim as possible. |
Let me ask you a question... have you yet to watch the video? If so... you would notice that they do polling criteria and selection that is greater then most polls.
MSNBC's source here (not mine) is greater specifically because they do things most polling companies do NOT do.
That's why it is superior.