By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
chocoloco said:
Kasz216 said:
chocoloco said:



Not saying much because I am tired of reading Badgenome's constant annoying opinions and would rather just analyze the recent polls.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/election_2012

http://electoral-vote.com/

MSNBC of all people actually had a better source of it.

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49108014/

Essentially what it found was it made pretty much zero difference among TRUE undecideds.

The "More likely" and "Less likely" numbers just due to boring ass partisian sources that were or werent' going to vote for him anyway.

I do not see any reason that that source is more reliable than the others, still I will admit polls vary and that is why I put up multiple sources. It cannot be denied that I the most recent polls do show an increase for Obama in several key states. Both maps show an increase for Obama in the states I mentioned at the bottomn of the post. It is easy to overlook.

Edit: and I added another one for you.

http://www.polltrack.com/presidential

If you listened to the video.  You would of heard why it was more reliable.

So it makes me question whether you watched the video or not.

This is MSNBC here, they aren't trying to hoodwink you... as noted by the entire conversation aftewords trying to spin the details.

Are you looking at the politcal maps or are you just reading the bits of information about Romney I added afterwards.

Edit: The most important thing I see in this is there is not much that is going to sway swing voters. Still if we are discussing this it is some what important.

My main points was that the political map does now show a slightly bigger edge for Obama than a week ago. Now I know this is not perfectly accurate, but I think the political maps are the best source we have towards how the election will play out.