Pavolink said:
For good (or bad) Nintendo is focusing in whatever they are good to do, rather than do everything, like Sony. For the genres or types of games they cannot do they want third parties in the console. For example, I don't think Nintendo will be able to do a kind of Monster Hunter or Dragon Quest as good as the originals. So instead of trying, they'll attract the third party and focus resources on the games they are good making. As mentioned before, this could be a good or a bad decision. In the case of this thread, is bad. |
I know what you mean but to be honest make Xenoblade a game with online multiplayer and I will gladly forget i ever knew Monster Hunter. I can exist without a game that forces me to see a loading screen 100x inside the same small area which is split into 100 smaller ones. And seriously I dont need to take my knife out and skin a dinosaur or something just to get its "drop". The battle system is a bit different yeah but still I dont really see (besides the knife part and the multiplayer well and diving) how Monster Hunter has something Xenoblade does not.
Everytime I play Xenoblade I cry because it has no multiplayer (I also cry because Skyrim or Just Cause2 have no multiplayer but at least there are the MP mods but thats another story)