Australia politician links gay marriage to bestiality.

[fordy]

happydolphin said:

Jay520 said:

Your argument is weak because it's completely dependent upon your subjective definition of sacred union. Using your logic, I could define 'sacred union' as 'two humans in love'. Which would mean that homosexual marriage falls under the category of 'sacred union'. Therefore, I could make the argument that homosexual marriage is not a step towards beastiality, and it would be just as valid as your argument.

You could, and you do. The only difference between you and I is that you pretend to be objective, while I do not. I'm basing my judgement on my personal values, which are subjective, as do you.

How about some objectivity with objectivity?

What right do you have to impose your beliefs on others, and tell them that they cannot do such a thing? Are you in the same group seeking to make the drawing of Mohammed illegal?