| happydolphin said: I understand, that definition suits a specific purpose, such as a person might be sexually aroused by what is forbidden, and as such in a context where inter-racial sexual relations were forbidden that could be considered stimulation due to paraphilia. But what I meant was different, and I may not have the right term, but for lack of a better term I used paraphilia to mean anything that I, personally, do not consider sacred union. As such, inter-racial sex doesn't fit that description, for me, as I outlined it earlier. So, with that in mind, the logic stands. |
Your argument is weak because it's completely dependent upon your subjective definition of sacred union. Using your logic, I could define 'sacred union' as 'two humans in love'. Which would mean that homosexual marriage falls under the category of 'sacred union'. Therefore, I could make the argument that homosexual marriage is not a step towards beastiality, and it would be just as valid as your argument.
