| happydolphin said: That's a good argument. And as you said, paraphilia is in the eyes of the beholder. Each man his own judge, I personally define paraphilia as anything outside the union of a man and a woman of consentual age, no matter the race or culture, not directly related (aka siblings). Anything outside of that I personally consider, by my conscience, to be paraphilia. However, no matter how one delimits the bounds of paraphilia, accepting one form is a means to accepting another, in other words my logic stands, we just start from different premices. |
And what is that definition based off of?
Looking at the definition of paraphilia, it deals with sexual attraction which isn't normal. And in the past, interacial marriage was certainly not normal, it was even illegal in many areas. So, interacial marriage was definitely a form of paraphila. Therefore, you must agree that, at the time, the legalization of interacial marriage was a step towards any other form of paraphilia. Correct?
